“They don’t want us anywhere”: The impact of anti-homelessness policies on unhoused communities

“They don’t want us anywhere”: The impact of anti-homelessness policies on unhoused communities

The Criminalization of Homelessness

Homelessness is not a new phenomenon in the United States, but the ways in which society has responded to it have evolved over time. The modern conception of homelessness can be traced back to the 1980s, when economic recessions, high housing costs, and cuts to social services led to a dramatic increase in the number of people living without stable housing.

However, the response to this growing crisis has often taken the form of punitive measures rather than compassionate solutions. Many cities have implemented anti-homelessness laws, such as bans on camping, panhandling, and sleeping in public spaces, in an effort to “clean up” the streets and make homelessness less visible. These policies are rooted in the belief that homelessness is a personal failing rather than a systemic issue, and that the solution is to simply remove homeless individuals from public view.

The impact of these anti-homelessness policies on unhoused communities has been devastating. As one participant in a recent study put it, “They don’t want us anywhere.” Homeless individuals are forced to constantly relocate, often with little notice, losing their personal belongings and disrupting their access to essential services and resources. This not only exacerbates the challenges they already face, but also erodes their sense of belonging and connection to the community.

The Tangible Losses of Anti-Homelessness Policies

One of the most significant impacts of anti-homelessness policies is the tangible loss of personal property and documents. When homeless individuals are forced to quickly pack up and relocate, they often have to leave behind important items such as identification cards, medication, and even personal mementos. This can have far-reaching consequences, making it even more difficult for them to access essential services, secure employment, and ultimately transition out of homelessness.

As one participant in the study explained, “I lost everything that time. Tent, clothes, phone, radio, IDs, birth certificate, jail paperwork to get benefits… I haven’t gotten the documents replaced yet. I try not to keep valuable things anymore.” The repeated loss of these crucial items can be a significant barrier to stability and self-sufficiency, trapping individuals in a cycle of homelessness.

The Emotional Toll of Constant Relocation

Beyond the tangible losses, the emotional toll of constantly being forced to relocate is immense. Participants in the study described a sense of exhaustion and despair, as they struggled to find new places to set up camp and adapt to the ever-changing landscape of the city.

“It’s been very frustrating when you find a place, and you set up your tent, and everything is going fine, and someone comes and says you have to leave,” one woman said through tears. “I move with friends from place, to place, to place, and it’s just very unsettling. I’m 65 years old, and you get settled in your ways as you get older, and to get uprooted nearly constantly…”

This constant state of instability and displacement takes a significant toll on the mental and emotional well-being of homeless individuals, further entrenching them in the cycle of homelessness.

The Shrinking Spaces of Belonging

As cities continue to grow and develop, the spaces where homeless individuals can safely reside are becoming increasingly limited. Participants in the study expressed a sense of being pushed further and further out of the city, with fewer and fewer places where they feel they belong.

“This whole area’s getting renovated, so the wooded areas are going to get smaller and smaller,” one participant explained. “So, we gotta take this private property safe haven as long as we can. I’m concerned about where we’re gonna go after this because it’s really only a matter of time.”

This sentiment of being unwanted and unwelcome in their own city is a common thread among the unhoused individuals interviewed. They feel that they are being systematically excluded from the public spaces that should be accessible to all, further isolating them from the community and resources they need to escape homelessness.

The Disconnect Between Homeless and Housed Communities

Underlying these challenges is a deeper disconnect between homeless and housed communities. Participants in the study described a sense of being viewed as a “problem” to be dealt with, rather than as fellow human beings deserving of compassion and support.

“Some of the neighbors don’t want us around. We’re not made for society, so society pushes us off, further and further out of the city… It’s not only code compliance that’s doing it, but society’s doing it, too. But they don’t want no part of the homeless. Some of them don’t even care about it.”

This dehumanization and lack of empathy from the general public only serves to further marginalize the homeless, making it even more difficult for them to access the resources and support they need to improve their circumstances.

Towards a More Compassionate Approach

The findings of this study highlight the urgent need for a more compassionate and holistic approach to addressing homelessness. Rather than relying on punitive measures that criminalize the very existence of homeless individuals, cities should focus on expanding access to affordable housing, mental health and addiction services, and other resources that can help people transition out of homelessness.

As one participant in the study eloquently put it, “The situation nowadays, they don’t want us anywhere.” It is time for our society to recognize that homelessness is not a personal failing, but rather a complex issue rooted in structural inequalities and a lack of investment in the well-being of all members of our communities.

By shifting our approach from criminalization to compassion, we can create a more just and inclusive society where everyone has access to the resources and support they need to thrive. This is not only the right thing to do, but it is also a crucial step towards addressing the growing crisis of homelessness in the United States.

Conclusion

The impact of anti-homelessness policies on unhoused communities is profound, leading to the loss of personal property and documents, constant emotional turmoil, and a growing sense of exclusion from the very spaces they should have a right to occupy. As cities continue to grapple with the challenges of homelessness, it is essential that we move beyond punitive measures and towards a more compassionate and holistic approach that recognizes the dignity and humanity of all individuals, regardless of their housing status.

By working to address the root causes of homelessness and investing in solutions that provide access to affordable housing, mental health services, and other crucial resources, we can create a more just and inclusive society where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. This is not only a moral imperative, but also a critical step towards building stronger, more resilient communities for all.

To learn more about the Joint Action for Water organization and their work in promoting sustainable and equitable water and sanitation solutions, please visit https://jointactionforwater.org/.

Scroll to Top